Why Dog Fighting Should Be Legal

The British have always had a special relationship with dogs. For centuries, they kept more dogs private than citizens of any other country in the world (Vesey-Fitzgerald 1948:553; Harding, 2012). During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, dog fighting, like other animal bait, was popular and enjoyed royal support, and many nobles became commercial dog breeders (Evans and Forsyth, 1997). Aristocrats also rely on their own dogs in battles where dogs compete with bears (Brownstein 1969). The popularity of dog fighting reached its peak in the eighteenth century, when dog fighting was commonplace at festivals and folk festivals (Kalof and Taylor, 2007; Harding, 2012). Dog fighting does not exist in a vacuum, but occurs in conjunction with a variety of peripheral criminal activities. Law enforcement officers responding to dog fighting complaints must be prepared to deal with some or all of the following offenses: (California state laws are used as examples only; each jurisdiction has equivalent laws that should be referenced.) Learn to spot the signs of dogfights. If you suspect surgery in your area, inform your local law enforcement agency and urge officers to contact HSUS for practical tools, advice, and support. If you live in one of the states where it is still a crime to be a bystander in a dogfight, please write to your state legislators urging them to make it a crime.

For professional and amateur dog fighters, selling puppies from parents who have won multiple fights is an important part of their business. Clandestine dog fighting publications and websites are often used to promote young animals or the availability of breeding animals. While there are many dog breeds used for fighting around the world — including the Fila Brasileiro, Dogo Argentino, Tosa Inu, and Presa Canario — the dog of choice for fighting in the United States is the American Pit Bull Terrier. Sometimes other breeds and mixtures would be used in street fighting or as “bait” dogs, used by some to train victims of dog fighting. Your last point seems to me to be the strongest objection. It is quite possible that dog fighting is so taboo in Western society that it could not be made profitable enough to maintain the necessary facilities. You get a ∆ for it. Beneficial ownership of fighting dogs is important to establish in cases where the “owners” of fighting dogs who injure other people or animals are guilty. [105] Under these laws, “owners” can be held criminally liable for injuries inflicted by their dogs, whether or not the owners are in possession of the dogs at the time of the attack. In Menschen v. Beam [ 106 ], the court held that the owner of fighting dogs could be held criminally liable under subsection 750.49(10) of the Code of Criminal Procedure [ 107 ] for fatal devastation caused by his dogs, even if he was detained at the time of the attack and the animals were temporarily in the custody of a third party. According to the court, an “owner” is a person with the “legal right of ownership” and actual possession is not necessary to establish ownership.

[ 108 ] I raised the issue of training. Dogs can be extremely vicious on their own. Illegal horse racing still exists, but this is quite rare compared to the legal alternative. Animal cruelty is prevalent in horse racing, circuses, the food industry, pest control, etc. Dog fighting is a violent and highly secretive enterprise that is extremely difficult for law enforcement and investigative professionals to infiltrate. A dogfight investigation requires many of the same skills and resources as a large secret drug investigation and calls into question the resources of any agency that wants to intervene. Dog with wounds and scars from dog fighting. City of Boston. Dog fighting also means belonging to a certain social environment. Watching fights, regularly presenting yourself as an observer or as a dog owner, means joining and investing in a subgroup and creating social bonds, which often leads to friendships.

These new relationships can also be beneficial in other social areas. Relationships of trust are forged on the basis of mutual interests, belong to the same milieu, and are familiar with cultural codes of conduct and slang (Lawson 2017). This trust can form the basis of long-term relationships or friendships, while social media enables and spreads the fascination with aerial combat (Harding, 2012; Harding and Nurse, 2015). They provide a variety of opportunities to build relationships, observe combat up close, evaluate participating dogs, and keep abreast of international events online and offline (Smith, 2011; Lawson, 2017). There is even a category known as cyber-dog men who learn to treat and train their dogs by taking advice and tricks from other members of social media platforms (Gibson 2005). Dog fighting had been popular with the poorest people in Honduras for decades. The most common dog of choice for trainers was the American Pit Bull Terrier. The matches took place in the slums of Tegucigalpa, with the fighting taking place in a simple sand pit surrounded by stands, often with only a few dozen spectators. Dog fighting was more of a hobby for those living in poverty than a form of play for locals.

[1] Harding S, Nurse A (2015) Analysis of British Dog Fighting, Laws and Crimes. Project report. Middlesex University, London, UK Some dog breeds previously imported from France on the black market are now illegal. However, dog fighting as an activity was not specifically prohibited. [50] There are several compelling reasons for this. Because fighting dogs generate such high profits, the penalties associated with misdemeanor convictions are far too low to have a sufficient deterrent effect and are simply seen as a cost of doing business. In addition to building their reputation by exchanging fighting dogs and participating in dog shows, Dogfighters share their fighting videos and photos with their international contacts via WhatsApp and private Facebook groups. During our research, we participated in closed Facebook groups where European fighting dogs communicate with each other. They offered and sold their fighting dogs openly via Facebook and shared photos and videos of dog fights to show how strong and muscular their dogs were.

Photos of injuries sustained during the fighting were also shared. In our study, we found that dog fighting is not exclusively a male phenomenon. Contrary to the findings of Evans et al. (1998) on “masculinity in dog fighting subcultures”, we encountered a relatively large number of women who were heavily involved in dog fighting. Women have also participated in other activities such as animal husbandry and training. During our research, we also met women who watched, bet on illegal fights and even organized. According to a dog fighter who drew attention to the role of breeding, fighting dog care and family life: In recent years, public attention has increased for dog fighting in Europe. This article focuses on this phenomenon in the Netherlands: its organization, its different actors, its modus operandi and its possible involvement of organized crime. This qualitative research is based on semi-structured interviews, police record analyses, observations and online methods.

As a result of criminalization, dog fighting went underground in the Netherlands, creating an illegal market and a subculture of dogmas and canine women. Reputation, status and trust are among the most remarkable characteristics of this subculture, which manifests itself in their analyzed communication. Dog fighting is very common and can be found in parts of eastern, western, northern and southern India. The practice is illegal under Indian law. Dog fighting rings are becoming increasingly popular and have become a hobby for the empires of India. [ref. needed] Do you really think shelters would be acceptable if they benefited from dog fighting? Over the years, law enforcement raids have brought to light many disturbing facets of this illegal practice. Young children are often present at these events, which fosters insensitivity to animal suffering, enthusiasm for violence, and disregard for the law. Illegal gambling is commonplace in dogfights, where thousands of dollars at stake are at stake.

This profitability makes dog fighting commonplace, both in organized crime and on the street.